After some thinking, I found an acceptable solution.
The "one network card" Synologys still have 2 USB 2.0 ports where you can use a Wlan adapter.
Now I can download and install the Synology updates.
You just have to know how to help yourself.
After some thinking, I found an acceptable solution.
The "one network card" Synologys still have 2 USB 2.0 ports where you can use a Wlan adapter.
Now I can download and install the Synology updates.
You just have to know how to help yourself.
And are you able to ping the T0 uplink interface (10.4.14.10) from:
Good to know... hopefully everything we have in place now will play nicely with the new releases!
We also do it all with our external ipam. We use event subscriptions to update the ipam appropriately during deploy and destroy operations and update the properties of the vm as well.
I'm able to ping '10.4.14.10' from my laptop on the LAN and from the ToR. Even the ping to '10.4.14.11' (NAT translated IP) is working.
BTW I'm observing that tunnel status on the edge hosting the Tier0 router shows as down. This was up last nigh (iow 8+ hours back)
api/v1/transport-nodes/8e7ef61e-775d-11e9-9ad6-005056a55d96/tunnels { "tunnels": [ { "name": "geneve168037270", "status": "DOWN", "egress_interface": "fp-eth0", "local_ip": "10.4.11.152", "remote_ip": "10.4.11.150", "remote_node_id": "a6291406-72a4-11e9-a5a9-005056a55d90", "remote_node_display_name": "nsxtedge01", "encap": "GENEVE", "bfd": { "state": "DOWN", "active": true, "forwarding": false, "diagnostic": "CONTROL_DETECTION_TIME_EXPIRED", "remote_state": "DOWN", "remote_diagnostic": "NO_DIAGNOSTIC" }, "last_updated_time": 1558201153510 } ], "result_count": 1, "sort_by": "tunnelName", "sort_ascending": true }
But the interface itself is up
root@nsxtedge02:~# nsxcli NSX CLI (Edge 2.4.0.0.0.12454265). Press ? for command list or enter: help nsxtedge02> vrf 0 nsxtedge02(vrf)> get interfaces Logical Router UUID VRF LR-ID Name Type 736a80e3-23f6-5a2d-81d6-bbefb2786666 0 0 TUNNEL Interfaces Interface : 9fd3c667-32db-5921-aaad-7a88c80b5e9f Ifuid : 261 Mode : blackhole Interface : 31f2f7f3-0c5c-579a-8306-42968882cb0e Ifuid : 288 Name : Mode : lif IP/Mask : 10.4.11.152/24 MAC : 00:50:56:a5:fa:fd LS port : 1f3fbeae-b02f-55a5-95d8-5f388421767e Urpf-mode : PORT_CHECK Admin : up Op_state : up MTU : 1600 Interface : f322c6ca-4298-568b-81c7-a006ba6e6c88 Ifuid : 260 Mode : cpu nsxtedge02(vrf)>
The VTEP IP on this edge, 10.4.11.152 is not pingable from anywhere else, except from vrf 0 on the edge itself.
This upgrade seems to be possible according to the VMware Product Interoperability Matrices
Can someone please share the official upgrade documentation for 6.7U2 like there is for the 6.5U2 https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.5/vsphere-esxi-vcenter-server-652-upgrade-guide.pdf
Thanks
Did you ever get a solution for this? I've got the same problem
Hang on here. So you have your TEP network on the same segment as your VLAN uplink for the T0? If so, that's not going to work. They need to be on separate networks. The underlay and VLAN transport zone cannot be the same.
Update: have disabled native embedded GPU on the server which is only possible when the server defects an installed GPU on PCI-e. However, when enabling passthrough and rebooting it goes back to disabled.
Thank you,
Caleb
My TEP network on tier 0 is 10.4.11.0/24 and my up link network is 10.4.14.0/24. They are different. Where did you see them to be the same?
My mistake, you are correct.
On your VLAN TZ, are you configuring a VLAN ID? Can you show your edge interface assignments?
If you had only gone to the same site where you found the 6.5 U2 guide, you would have located it.
https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.7/vsphere-vcenter-server-672-upgrade-guide.pdf
That's an unsupported GPU to begin with, either passed through or otherwise, so your mileage may vary.
Hi,
Yep painful indeed.
Yes it has been reported before, see here:
This was addressed in VMware Fusion 8.5.8 as far as I can tell.
edit: Oh and as far as Fusion 6 goes...
VMware Fusion 6.x does not run on macOS High Sierra.
If you had Fusion 8 installed and then upgrade, it might work, but would not be supported.
So you would need at least Fusion 10 in order to run on a host with macOS High Sierra.
Beware though that Fusion 10 has different hardware requirements as Fusion 6.
--
Wil
Problem Description:
I have 2 logical in a datacenters is a cross vcenter environment.The segregation for datacenters is logical but the physical devices(Nexus,servers,firewall) resides on the same site/location/racks.
Primary Site - Vcenter 6.7
Secondary site - Vcenter 6.7
NSX version - 6.4.3
I have created a universal logical switch of network 10.1.80.0/24 connected with the universal DLR.
In primary site i have been running the workload for the last 6 months and all the communication is working fine.
Recently we decided to optimize the use of secondary site and deployed few vmware applications(OVF based) onto the stretched vxlan(10.1 .80.0/24) networks on secondary site.
The issue is I am not able to open the VAMI page of my appliances from my primary site vxlan/vlans to the secondary site stretched vxlan(10.1.80.0/24).
Though I can ping/telnet the servers from my primary site to secondary site server but the application refuses to connect.
As per the attached Diagram VM A is not able to access the URL/Applications/vami pages for VM B and vice versa.
Although VM A can ping/telnet to VM B and vice versa.
Key Points:
Physical firewall is not involved in the entire communication.
NSX firewall/distributed firewalls are disabled.
Ping/telnet is absolutely working fine hence no routing issues.
Attached the logical Diagram.
Does anybody else have faced such weird issue? Or am i missing anything?
Hi,
For a variety of tips on how-to shrink and clean up your guest OS's also see my wiki article here:
Shrink guest on hosted platform - VI-Toolkit
--
Wil
Hi,
Assuming you want the Windows version here's a direct link:
Download VMware Workstation Pro 14.1.7
-
Wil
1. vCloud Usage Meter 3.5 Build 4359663 (Put in place by our engineering dept, but supported by my group. Engineering decides on when/if it gets any updates or upgrades to new versions.)
2.
extensionList Extension[]
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.sms"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.vsm"] Extension
extensionList["VirtualCenter"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.stats.report"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.sps"] Extension
(less...)
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.vcha"] Extension
extensionList["hostdiag"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.ls"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vim.eam"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.rbd"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.nsx.ui.h5"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vShieldManager"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vmcam"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vco"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vsan.health"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vcIntegrity"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.ovf"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.vcenter.iso"] Extension
extensionList["com.vmware.cl"] Extension
extensionList["com.zerto.plugin"] Extension
3. We have ~15 vCenter servers in the company, 5 of them associated with vCloud including this one, 4 for internal purposes, and none of them have vROps installed. We have not dealt with it at all. We have no licenses for it, and haven't ever, as far as I've been told. This one vCenter is the only one complaining about it, and it just started out of nowhere, unless engineering was doing an unannounced and unapproved change.
What a ratio VRAM for each VM? I am run 10+ VM with 3D game. Workstation use VRAM?
Put in place by our engineering dept, but supported by my group. Engineering decides on when/if it gets any updates or upgrades to new versions.
In this case your engineering team did not do a good job. vCloud Usage Meter 3.5 is End-of-Support since April 1, 2019 and VMware requires all service and cloud providers to explicitly upgrade to at least version 3.6 (or better 3.6.1 Hotpatch 2). According to your VCPP contract and the VCPP Product Usage Guide you are obliged to do this. Providers who have not updated by March 31, 2019 may be subject to a compliance review.
See: Usage Meter 3.5 End of General Support | VMware Cloud Provider Blog
Version 3.6.1 also has some bugfixes concerning the metering of vROps. Maybe this already solves your problem. Therefore I strongly recommend to update to version 3.6.1 Hotpatch 2 as soon as possible.